Quotelowpro75 - 7/22/2011 3:45 PM
So, going through the categories there are a few instances where I could see negative feedback being given and others where it isn't really applicable or just a bad idea.
I know it's an obvious rip to leave negative feedback for someone who sends you free cigars, but it's not too far behind, and a subtle rip, to leave no feedback at all.
Also, if you pull up some people's ratings you will see feedback left for them for buy, sell, split, and trades. If you then look up the rating for the person they dealt with there is no feedback left from them for that transaction. You'll find some members fail to reciprocate regularly. If it was a good transaction, reciprocate the feedback. If not, leave neutral or negative feedback so we can know it didn't go well and that part of the feedback system can do what it is designed to do.
Since Rich seems to be making the most sense on this and giving this the most consideration I have a couple of questions for him.
Take the fantasy football league. By joining into the competition and pledging at the start cigars as the prize to the winner aren't the participants contest sponsors? If someone who owed the winner cigars didn't send the winner any would it be appropriate for the winner to leave them negative feedback? Should the winner leave positive feedback for those who do send them cigars?
There are those who choose to not take the time or consideration or whatever to leave positive feedback for a bomb, gift, or contest winnings. You can obviously stop sending those people bombs or gifts. In the future, if you sponsor a contest, a critique, or moderate a pass, is it cool to preclude those members who haven't left you feedback?